Prior inspection reports typically come up from a deal that didn’t go through. A good report can bolster a property’s value, but a bad report can hurt. The question often asked,
“Do I have to provide a bad report to subsequent buyers?” The bottom line answer is YES. Prior reports constitute material facts. A seller's duty to disclose his knowledge of defects does not end when he completes a written Seller Property Disclosure. A seller's knowledge includes prior inspection reports obtained by previous buyers. Sellers have an ongoing duty to disclose any defects revealed in those reports. The Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act (“BRRETA”) is the Georgia consumer protection state statute that governs the relationship between real estate brokers and real estate consumers. Regarding a Broker’s duties to other parties, BRETTA states the following: A broker engaged by a seller must disclose all the following to all parties with whom the broker is working: All adverse material facts pertaining to the physical condition of the property and improvements located on such property including but not limited to material defects in the property, environmental contamination, and facts required by statute or regulation to be disclosed which are actually known by the broker which could not be discovered by a reasonably diligent inspection of the property by the buyer. Seth Weissman, attorney at Weissman PC and general counsel for Georgia REALTORS®, in his Safe Real Estate Series, covers 4 Listing Agent scenarios:
So, now you know, you have to disclose the bad report. Consider a few courses of action: Get a new report that neutralizes the bad report. Or, if that is not a possibility, the seller should consider repairing the defects. Or, consider adjusting the price to reflect the defects. Always weigh on the side of disclosure, regardless of how much it might hurt. Prior inspection reports constitute material facts concerning the property which a purchaser is entitled to know in making the decision whether to buy the property.
1 Comment
AJ
2/5/2024 10:44:03 pm
I've heard other real estate attorneys say that you DON'T have to disclose previous reports because the duty is to disclose items "which could not be discovered by a reasonably diligent inspection of the property by the buyer" and the items in the report were in fact, "discovered by a reasonably diligent inspection of the property by the buyer." Thoughts? I know it's always better to err on the side of too much disclosure, but found this take to be very interesting.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
RMAAReal Estate News, Brokers Blog & More Categories
All
Archives
September 2024
|